Blogger BlogNet68615




Improving Teamwork With KAI - A Tool to Measure Problem-Solving Styles

0 comments

Can you answer this riddle? What human trait is......genetically determined...readily apparent in young children...can be reliably measured in teenagers...and does not change with age or experience? If you answered problem-solving style, give yourself a gold star!

Believe it or not, all of us have an innate style that we use to solve problems and make decisions. And, according to one theory, our styles range from high adaption to high innovation. The "Adaption-Innovation" theory was developed by Dr. Michael Kirton, a noted expert in occupational research. Kirton's theory is the subject of more than 90 dissertations and over 400 research papers.

KAI, or Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory, is based on the theory. It's considered a highly reliable psychometric tool for measuring how people tend to solve problems, make decisions and express themselves creatively.

How Does KAI Work?

KAI uses a carefully constructed questionnaire to assess whether a person tends to be more "adaptive" or more "innovative." After completing the evaluation, a person receives a KAI score that shows them where they fall along the Adaption-Innovation continuum.

KAI teaches, and research supports, distinctive differences in cognitive style between the Adaptive and Innovative ends of the spectrum. For example, adaptors prefer more structured problem-solving methods and are most comfortable when everyone is in agreement about the process and the solution. They are also more likely to try to solve a problem by working within the current system as opposed to developing a completely new one.

In contrast, innovators are at ease with a less structured problem-solving approach, and don't view a lack of consensus as an obstacle to finding a new solution. Additionally, they tend to look beyond the status quo for solutions, even to the point of overlooking positive aspects of the current system.

KAI and Teamwork

So does this make "innovators" more innovative? Not necessarily. Neither style is more creative, or better at problem-solving or decision-making. Depending on the situation, one style may be more adept at solving the problem at hand. In many cases, however, a team composed of both adaptors and innovators is the most effective--as long as they understand how to work together and respect each other's differences.

On the other hand, research shows that style differences of 20 points or more on the KAI scale lead to communication and trust issues, often affecting a team's ability to work together. For example, the more adaptive person on the team will try to solve the problem meticulously, aided by many details, while the more innovative person will prefer to stay high level and manage the big picture. The innovative person will also be eager to solve the problem by looking at it from unsuspected angles, while the more adaptive person will want to apply tried and tested solutions.

It's not uncommon for team members to mistake these differences in cognitive style ("cognitive gaps") for differences in capacity or ability. This can lead to generalizations ("She's an accountant, she doesn't care about the big picture") and misperceptions ("This idea is just the boss's latest pet project"). Such misunderstandings can lead to interpersonal conflict that seriously damages a team's collaborative ability.

Effective teamwork requires a balance between dynamic "innovative" thinking and risk-minimizing "adaptive" behavior. Understanding cognitive styles is the key to establishing this balance.

Breakthrough Management Group International (BMGI) helps organizations around the world systematically improve processes and increase innovation. For more about BMGI's corporate onsite services, visit http://www.bmgi.com. For open enrollment training, visit http://www.bmguniversity.com.

Research Paper
Thesis
Dissertation
Book Reports
Term Paper


Health-Fitness Articles Can Be Useful

0 comments

It's one of the great ironies of modern living that although there seems to be a raging epidemic of obesity and its terrible twin sisters: heart disease and diabetes, we are ever more obsessed with the whole subject of keeping fit. But then again perhaps it's not so ironic after all. In our grandparent's day, there was a lot more physical hard work to do. Labor saving devices that we take for granted these days were not available and what's more, people tended to die at a younger age in those days from infectious diseases. Hence our modern concern with keeping in shape and reading the ever growing numbers of health and fitness articles that seem to be available on the magazine racks of our local stores.

I have to say however, that looking at the covers of some of the more popular health and fitness publications does tend to dampen my enthusiasm. The people featured on those covers seem to be from another planet inhabited by the toned, the muscular and the incredibly beautiful. If you don't allow yourself to be put off however, and take a look at some of the health and fitness articles inside the magazines you are sure to pick up some really useful tips on how to get ahead in your quest for a better life style.

Here are a few of the more important tips that I've gleaned from having read countless numbers of health and fitness articles over the years. Perhaps the most important thing to take into account, according to the fitness experts, is be careful. Yes it sounds a bit boring, but if you are going to take on any fitness regime, make sure to get the go ahead from your doctor if you have any prior medical condition.

Always start your new exercise regime in a gentle, easygoing fashion. After all, it takes time for your body to adapt, especially if you are not that fit to begin with. Talk about boredom: now isn't that just one of the greatest problems when it comes to exercising? But here's a great tip: only choose a form of exercise which gives you some real personal satisfaction if you are to avoid getting fed up and end up giving up the whole thing after a few days. Try and set yourself some modest goals and the sheer satisfaction of achieving something will ensure you keep going.

There's been an explosion in the numbers of health and fitness articles, books and T.V. shows in recent years. Perhaps it would be easy to be cynical about all this and assume that it's just another money-making racket. But, I must admit I've found some great gems of information which have been of real benefit over the years. So get going with your new fitter way of living and who knows? You may well end up looking like one of those toned models on the cover of a health and fitness magazine.

Hi, I'm David Opal of http://www.reallyfitnow.com - it's a site all about remedies, cures, and advice on all matters about keeping fit and healthy. Simple solutions for common problems. I'm a keep fit and healthy kind of guy, and will be posting new solutions to common problems daily. Visit me for more Health Fitness Articles You might find what you're looking for.

Skin care tips



Can you answer this riddle? What human trait is......genetically determined...readily apparent in young children...can be reliably measured in teenagers...and does not change with age or experience? If you answered problem-solving style, give yourself a gold star!

Believe it or not, all of us have an innate style that we use to solve problems and make decisions. And, according to one theory, our styles range from high adaption to high innovation. The "Adaption-Innovation" theory was developed by Dr. Michael Kirton, a noted expert in occupational research. Kirton's theory is the subject of more than 90 dissertations and over 400 research papers.

KAI, or Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory, is based on the theory. It's considered a highly reliable psychometric tool for measuring how people tend to solve problems, make decisions and express themselves creatively.

How Does KAI Work?

KAI uses a carefully constructed questionnaire to assess whether a person tends to be more "adaptive" or more "innovative." After completing the evaluation, a person receives a KAI score that shows them where they fall along the Adaption-Innovation continuum.

KAI teaches, and research supports, distinctive differences in cognitive style between the Adaptive and Innovative ends of the spectrum. For example, adaptors prefer more structured problem-solving methods and are most comfortable when everyone is in agreement about the process and the solution. They are also more likely to try to solve a problem by working within the current system as opposed to developing a completely new one.

In contrast, innovators are at ease with a less structured problem-solving approach, and don't view a lack of consensus as an obstacle to finding a new solution. Additionally, they tend to look beyond the status quo for solutions, even to the point of overlooking positive aspects of the current system.

KAI and Teamwork

So does this make "innovators" more innovative? Not necessarily. Neither style is more creative, or better at problem-solving or decision-making. Depending on the situation, one style may be more adept at solving the problem at hand. In many cases, however, a team composed of both adaptors and innovators is the most effective--as long as they understand how to work together and respect each other's differences.

On the other hand, research shows that style differences of 20 points or more on the KAI scale lead to communication and trust issues, often affecting a team's ability to work together. For example, the more adaptive person on the team will try to solve the problem meticulously, aided by many details, while the more innovative person will prefer to stay high level and manage the big picture. The innovative person will also be eager to solve the problem by looking at it from unsuspected angles, while the more adaptive person will want to apply tried and tested solutions.

It's not uncommon for team members to mistake these differences in cognitive style ("cognitive gaps") for differences in capacity or ability. This can lead to generalizations ("She's an accountant, she doesn't care about the big picture") and misperceptions ("This idea is just the boss's latest pet project"). Such misunderstandings can lead to interpersonal conflict that seriously damages a team's collaborative ability.

Effective teamwork requires a balance between dynamic "innovative" thinking and risk-minimizing "adaptive" behavior. Understanding cognitive styles is the key to establishing this balance.

Breakthrough Management Group International (BMGI) helps organizations around the world systematically improve processes and increase innovation. For more about BMGI's corporate onsite services, visit http://www.bmgi.com. For open enrollment training, visit http://www.bmguniversity.com.

Custom Essay
Essay Writing Help
Thesis Proposal
Dissertation Help
Custom Research Papers


Blogger BlogNet68615: Nov 20, 2008

Recent Posts

Archives

Links


ATOM 0.3